The Final Showdown a Thermonuclear
War: United States vs. Russia
By: Ricardo C. Amaral
As Gerald Celente have been saying for a while: “World War III” has been underway...and that spark similar to the Archduke Franz Ferdinand event can happen at any time.”
The ironic thing is that some people in the United States is so delusional, that they think the US can win a thermonuclear war against Russia.
The reality is: there would be no winner in such a thermonuclear war. Everybody lose that one.
As Gerald Celente have been saying for a while: “World War III” has been underway...and that spark similar to the Archduke Franz Ferdinand event can happen at any time.”
The ironic thing is that some people in the United States is so delusional, that they think the US can win a thermonuclear war against Russia.
The reality is: there would be no winner in such a thermonuclear war. Everybody lose that one.
Here is a reality check that would be
very inconvenient and also bad for our health.
For example here is a preview of things to come, just imagine 7,000 of these fireworks lighting up the skies all around the United States:
For example here is a preview of things to come, just imagine 7,000 of these fireworks lighting up the skies all around the United States:
The Day After (1983)
**********
Time: 11 min.
Star Wars tested for Eastern Europe; US
space weapons "unofficial declaration of war"; "soft
assassinations" planned for last weekend's EU election
winners.
Seek truth from facts with Gladio, NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe author and former European MP Richard Cottrell; Stop NATO newslist's Rick Rozoff; and Bruce Gagnon of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.
Seek truth from facts with Gladio, NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe author and former European MP Richard Cottrell; Stop NATO newslist's Rick Rozoff; and Bruce Gagnon of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.
**********
A lot of people in Washington are
gung-ho about using thermonuclear weapons against Russia, but there's
just a minor drawback about that type of strategy – there will be
no human beings alive in our planet to take a victory lap.
Greg Hunter – June 3, 2014
Is
America safe if the U.S. makes a preemptive nuclear strike? Dr. Paul
Craig Robert's says no-way and explains, "Even if every American
city is spared retaliation, all the Americans would die too due to
the radiation and due to the nuclear winter. . . . all of the
temperate climates would have freezing temperatures every day of the
year for three years. So, clearly there wouldn't be any food grown.
This is over and above whatever the radiation does to people."
What about Russia and China making a first strike of their own? Do you think that is far-fetched? Dr. Roberts points out, "What I am telling you is in the public record. This isn't an opinion. This is all in the public record. Anyone can read it. The Russians and the Chinese are both fully aware of it. . . .
This is very dangerous for Washington to have this doctrine and to be implementing it by putting ABM bases in Poland. . . . Of course, these systems never work like people think they will work, they never do. There are no winners. It is impossible to win. This is ignorance, and the belief you can win a nuclear war makes it possible, makes it likely. "
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
What about Russia and China making a first strike of their own? Do you think that is far-fetched? Dr. Roberts points out, "What I am telling you is in the public record. This isn't an opinion. This is all in the public record. Anyone can read it. The Russians and the Chinese are both fully aware of it. . . .
This is very dangerous for Washington to have this doctrine and to be implementing it by putting ABM bases in Poland. . . . Of course, these systems never work like people think they will work, they never do. There are no winners. It is impossible to win. This is ignorance, and the belief you can win a nuclear war makes it possible, makes it likely. "
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
Note:
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the Chairman
of the The Institute for Political Economy. In a varied career,
spanning academia, journalism, business and public service, he has
held numerous senior academic positions in universities; was an
associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal ; and was
appointed by President Reagan as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
for Economic Policy during Reagan's first term in office; after which
he served as a consultant to both the U.S. Department of Defense and
the U.S. Department of Commerce.
**********
April 2006
Here is one of my postings at the Elite
Trader Forum in April 2006, when we were having a discussion on that
forum about the nuclear weapons problem between the US and North
Korea.
Toc: Reply to SouthAmerica,
At this moment, US can launch first strike on Russia and destroy ALL its nukes and any retaliation capability. With such standing US can afford to meddle into the internal affairs of a terrorist mullah fanatic nation like Iran.
At this moment, US can launch first strike on Russia and destroy ALL its nukes and any retaliation capability. With such standing US can afford to meddle into the internal affairs of a terrorist mullah fanatic nation like Iran.
*****
April 11, 2006
SouthAmerica: You obviously never heard
of “Satan”. “Satan” is the code name for the Russian nuclear
weapons system that can launch a nuclear war. The Russians nuclear
missiles system can be reprogrammed to hit every major US city in a
matter of one minute. As soon the Russians think that the US has
launched nuclear missiles on their direction they would press the
bottom in the “Satan” box.
“Satan” is programmed to not accept any reprogramming after its missiles have been launched from Russia and Satan launches 7,000 nuclear warheads at the same time with one push of the bottom.
“Satan” is programmed to not accept any reprogramming after its missiles have been launched from Russia and Satan launches 7,000 nuclear warheads at the same time with one push of the bottom.
Sure the US can launch a nuclear warhead against the Russians. But can the US handle the 7,000 warheads that would be coming on its way and would hit every major US city?
Sorry Toc, but you believe in “Fairy
Tales,” the reality is: the US can’t afford a nuclear warhead
exchange even with starving North Korea, never mind with the
Russians.
Have you noticed how the US government
toned down its bullshit about nuclear weapons since the North Koreans
told them that they already have the nukes – you don’t see the US
government talking about attacking the North Korean nuclear weapons
facilities!
**********
Recent developments:
Russia to create two new super
missiles, more powerful than Satan – December 14, 2014
**********
Russia works on 100-ton monster
ballistic missile – December 19, 2011
**********
Reality check for a thermonuclear
war between the: USA vs. Russia
Don't worry about the nukes, the Soviet Union over 50 years ago they already had a thermonuclear weapon twice as powerful than the “Tsar Bomba” - just imagine what the Russians must have today with their state-of-the-art technology of the 21st century.
If the “Tsar Bomba” the 57 megaton bomb was 2,500 times more powerful than the deadly bomb that annihilated Hiroshima, then the Soviet Union 100 megaton bomb that they never tested must be at least 5,000 times more powerful than the deadly bomb that annihilated Hiroshima.
Tsar Bomba - 2,500 times more powerful than the deadly bomb that annihilated Hiroshima
Tsar Bomba ("Emperor Bomb")
is the nickname for the Russian hydrogen bomb, the most powerful
nuclear weapon ever detonated. It's October 30, 1961 test remains the
most powerful artificial nuclear explosion in human history.
It was the ultimate display of
mankind's destructive power - an earth-shattering explosion 2,500
times more powerful than the deadly bomb that annihilated Hiroshima
and helped bring an end to the Second World War.
***
Keep in mind the Tsar Bomb was
technology of 50 years ago most likely today the Russians have an
improved version of the Tsar Thermonuclear Bomb.
Discovery Channel -
Ultimates - Explosions - Tsar bomb segment
*****
The Tsar Bomba or “King of the Bombs” was just a 57,000,000 Tonnes of TNT – The Soviet Union had a “Thermonuclear Bomb” twice as powerful the 100,000,000 Tonnes thermonuclear bomb that was never tested – the Russians were afraid of testing that one, but the device was ready to go. If a “Tsar Bomba” was dropped in New York city the destruction it would have been astronomical, and that would have killed everything alive from New York to Philadelphia which is only 100 miles away.
I don't think the Soviet Union ever gave a name for the 100,000,000 Tonnes Thermonuclear bomb, but an appropriate name for this new toy is: “The Apocalypse”
If “The Apocalypse Thermonuclear bomb” ever be dropped in any US city the destruction it would be astronomical, and “The Apocalypse” could kill everything that is alive in a radius of over 200 miles around it.
“The Apocalypse Thermonuclear bomb” is 5,000 times more powerful than the deadly bomb that annihilated Hiroshima.
“The Apocalypse”
The Soviet Union had in 1963 a hydrogen bomb twice as powerful than “Big Ivan” or the “Tsar Bomba” - let's call the 100 megaton thermonuclear bomb: “The Apocalypse”
On 16 January 1963 Khrushchev made an
explicit claim that the Soviet Union was in possession of a 100
megaton bomb, claiming that it was located in East Germany.
It's very sad if the human race ever get to this point.
The
End
********************
Ricardo C. Amaral
Author and economist
.
